Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 8 results ...
Flyen, C, Hauge , Å L, Almås, A-J and Godbolt , Å L (2018) Municipal collaborative planning boosting climate resilience in the built environment. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 58-69.
Gatti, M P (2018) Maintenance, reconstruction and prevention for the regeneration of historic towns and centers. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 96-111.
Godbolt, Å L, Flyen, C, Hauge, Å L, Flyen, A-C and Moen, L L (2018) Future resilience of cultural heritage buildings: how do residents make sense of public authorities’ sustainability measures?. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 18-30.
Lassandro, P and Cosola, T (2018) Climate change mitigation: resilience indicators for roof solutions. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 4-17.
Marques, M, Monteiro, R and Delgado, R (2018) An improved model for seismic risk assessment in Portugal. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 70-83.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: vulnerability; hazard; exposure; loss estimation; real-time platform; seismic risk
- ISBN/ISSN:
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2016-0040
- Abstract:
Purpose Portugal experienced very destructive earthquakes in the past, such as the well-known “Lisbon earthquake” in 1755. With such in mind, accurate estimates of human and economic losses can play a significant role in providing various societal key players with objective information for response strategies. This paper aims to present the contribution of the most recent study in Portugal (PRISE) concerning comprehensive seismic risk assessment, which can be used as good practice and reproduced in different contexts. Design/methodology/approach PRISE (earthquake loss assessment of the Portuguese building stock) covered three main lines of research, corresponding to the three components typically considered in any seismic risk assessment study: the characterization of the seismic hazard, the identification of the exposure to earthquakes and loss potential and the vulnerability of the exposed assets. Each of these components has been fully characterized through the collection of census and local data (exposure), used to carry out nonlinear analysis (hazard and fragility). Findings By involving different research institutions and partners with extensive knowledge and expertise in the earthquake domains, the developed model is capable of producing economic and human earthquake loss estimates in real time (through an innovative Web-based platform) or for specific event scenarios, considering exposed population, residential and industrial buildings. The platform uses open-source tools and hence, it can be reproduced in other countries or contexts. Research limitations/implications Research wise, the hazard, vulnerability and exposure models can still be significantly improved, e.g. by adding critical infrastructure (hospitals, school buildings and bridges) or updating the nonlinear models, for more accurate loss predictions. Practical implications The findings and loss estimates for different earthquake scenarios show that planned interventions are required. Decision-makers and other relevant stakeholders (Civil Protection) can make use of the developed platform to produce specific estimates, to test the effect of different retrofitting interventions or to plan for emergency scenarios. Originality/value A real-time Web-based framework to estimate building damage and economic/human losses because of seismic events has been developed, aiming to provide the Portuguese Civil Protection and other playmakers with a unique platform for planning and preparing for emergency scenarios.
Ortiz, R, Macias-Bernal, J M and Ortiz, P (2018) Vulnerability and buildings service life applied to preventive conservation in cultural heritage. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 31-47.
Rahouti, A, Datoussaïd, S and Descamps, T (2018) Safety assessment of a high-rise dormitory in case of fire. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 84-95.
Yaman Galantini, Z D and Tezer, A (2018) Resilient urban planning process in question: Istanbul case. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(01), 48-57.